4.7 Article

Neural network based image segmentation for spatter extraction during laser-based powder bed fusion processing

Journal

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106347

Keywords

Neural network; Image segmentation; Spatter extraction; Laser-based powder bed fusion

Funding

  1. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China [2018B090905001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China, China [2017YFB1103900]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2018A030313044]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Shenzhen, China [JCYJ20170816171733384]
  5. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, China [2017CFB657]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [2042018kf0240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In situ monitoring of spatter signatures is often employed to improve product quality during laser-based powder bed fusion (LPBF). This paper describes a novel neural network (NN) based image segmentation method for spatter extraction with a simple labeling process and high accuracy results. Use of a 290-1100 nm waveband high-speed camera allowed capturing images with more complete spatter signatures and a more complex background compared with previous LPBF studies. Conventional image segmentation approaches are inadequate to perform spatter extraction because of the complex background. The proposed NN-based image segmentation method split images into a block grid and segmented each block using a parallel convolutional neural network (CNN) and a thresholding neural network (TNN), which permitted extracting 80.48% of spatters in only 70 ms. Furthermore, the ability to extract spatters connected to a molten pool distinguishes the proposed NN-based image segmentation method from conventional image segmentation approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available