Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Performance of the 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Central Visual Field Abnormalities in Glaucoma
Zhichao Wu et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2018)
24-2 Visual Fields Miss Central Defects Shown on 10-2 Tests in Glaucoma Suspects, Ocular Hypertensives, and Early Glaucoma
C. Gustavo De Moraes et al.
OPHTHALMOLOGY (2017)
Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients
Zhichao Wu et al.
OPHTHALMOLOGY (2017)
Detection of central visual field defects in early glaucomatous eyes: Comparison of Humphrey and Octopus perimetry
Gloria Roberti et al.
PLOS ONE (2017)
Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field
Hae-Young Lopilly Park et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2016)
Prevalence, Features, and Severity of Glaucomatous Visual Field Loss Measured With the 10-2. Achromatic Threshold Visual Field Test
Michael Sullivan-Mee et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2016)
Geographic Variation in the Use of Diagnostic Testing of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Open-Angle Glaucoma
Angela R. Elam et al.
OPHTHALMOLOGY (2016)
The 24-2 Visual Field Test Misses Central Macular Damage Confirmed by the 10-2 Visual Field Test and Optical Coherence Tomography
Lola M. Grillo et al.
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2016)
Choosing two points to add to the 24-2 pattern to better describe macular visual field damage due to glaucoma
Siyuan Chen et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2015)
Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach
Bruno M. R. Fidalgo et al.
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS (2015)
Comparing Glaucoma Progression on 24-2 and 10-2 Visual Field Examinations
Harsha L. Rao et al.
PLOS ONE (2015)
Prevalence and Nature of Early Glaucomatous Defects in the Central 10° of the Visual Field
Ilana Traynis et al.
JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY (2014)
Modifying the Conventional Visual Field Test Pattern to Improve the Detection of Early Glaucomatous Defects in the Central 10°
Alyssa C. Ehrlich et al.
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2014)
Are practical recommendations practiced? A national multi-centre cross-sectional study on frequency of visual field testing in glaucoma
Simon S. M. Fung et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2013)
Glaucomatous damage of the macula
Donald C. Hood et al.
PROGRESS IN RETINAL AND EYE RESEARCH (2013)
A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines
Rizwan Malik et al.
BMJ OPEN (2013)
Intervals between Visual Field Tests When Monitoring the Glaucomatous Patient: Wait-and-See Approach
David P. Crabb et al.
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE (2012)
THE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF EARLIEST GLAUCOMATOUS VISUAL FIELD DEFECTS DOCUMENTED BY AUTOMATIC PERIMETRY
ANDERS HEIJL et al.
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA (2009)
Perimetric point density and detection of glaucomatous visual field loss
Anders Heijl
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA (2009)
Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma
B. C. Chauhan et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY (2008)
Evaluation of practice patterns for the care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data - The glaucoma adherence and persistency study
Harry A. Quigley et al.
OPHTHALMOLOGY (2007)
Share Paper
