4.8 Article

Multi-color clonal tracking reveals intra-stage proliferative heterogeneity during mammary tumor progression

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 12-27

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41388-020-01508-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. SystemsX.ch MTD project MetastasiX
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation
  3. Swiss Cancer League
  4. Krebsliga Beider Basel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluates clonal heterogeneity within individual primary tumors and metastases and during different stages of malignant tumor progression, revealing substantial heterogeneity in gene expression. In the mouse model of clonal tracing, chemotherapy mainly targets slow-proliferative clonal populations, which may impact therapy selection and response in breast cancer patients.
Despite major progress in breast cancer research, the functional contribution of distinct cancer cell clones to malignant tumor progression and metastasis remains largely elusive. We have assessed clonal heterogeneity within individual primary tumors and metastases and also during the distinct stages of malignant tumor progression using clonal tracking of cancer cells in the MMTV-PyMT mouse model of metastatic breast cancer. Comparative gene expression analysis of clonal subpopulations reveals a substantial level of heterogeneity across and also within the various stages of breast carcinogenesis. The intra-stage heterogeneity is primarily manifested by differences in cell proliferation, also found within invasive carcinomas of luminal A-, luminal B-, and HER2-enriched human breast cancer. Surprisingly, in the mouse model of clonal tracing of cancer cells, chemotherapy mainly targets the slow-proliferative clonal populations and fails to efficiently repress the fast-proliferative populations. These insights may have considerable impact on therapy selection and response in breast cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available