4.8 Article

A 5′ UTR GGN repeat controls localisation and translation of a potassium leak channel mRNA through G-quadruplex formation

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 17, Pages 9822-9839

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa699

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gerald Kerkut Charitable Trust Studentships
  2. BBSRC [BB/H006834/1, BB/L010097/1, BB/L007576/1]
  3. Alzheimer's Research UK South Coast Network summer internship
  4. BBSRC [BB/H006834/1, BB/L007576/1, BB/L010097/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA G-quadruplexes (G4s) are secondary structures proposed to function as regulators of post-transcriptional mRNA localisation and translation. G4s within some neuronal mRNAs are known to control distal localisation and local translation, contributing to distinct local proteomes that facilitate the synaptic remodelling attributed to normal cellular function. In this study, we characterise the G4 formation of a (GGN) 13 repeat found within the 5' UTR of the potassium 2-pore domain leak channel Task3 mRNA. Biophysical analyses show that this (GGN)(13) repeat forms a parallel G4 in vitro exhibiting the stereotypical potassium specificity of G4s, remaining thermostable under physiological ionic conditions. Through mouse brain tissue G4-RNA immuno-precipitation, we further confirm that Task3 mRNA forms a G4 structure in vivo. The G4 is inhibitory to translation of Task3 in vitro and is overcome through activity of a G4-specific helicase DHX36, increasing K+ leak currents and membrane hyperpolarisation in HEK293 cells. Further, we observe that this G4 is fundamental to ensuring delivery of Task3 mRNA to distal primary cortical neurites. It has been shown that aberrant Task3 expression correlates with neuronal dysfunction, we therefore posit that this G4 is important in regulated local expression of Task3 leak channels that maintain K+ leak within neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available