4.8 Article

Mechanism of efficient double-strand break repair by a long non-coding RNA

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 19, Pages 10953-10972

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa784

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01 CA092584, R35 CA220430]
  2. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Knowledge GAP Award
  3. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP180813, RP130397]
  4. NIH [1R01 CA218025-01, 1R01CA231011-01, R01 CA162804]
  5. CPRIT Individual Investigator Research Award [180259]
  6. Program 'Equipe Labellisee' of the French National League Against Cancer
  7. PSL University 'NanoRep' grant
  8. CNRS
  9. Ecole normale superieure
  10. China Scholarship Council
  11. Wellcome Trust [200814/Z/16/Z]
  12. Robert A. Welch Chemistry Chair
  13. INSERM
  14. Cancer Prevention andResearch Institute of Texas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanistic studies in DNA repair have focused on roles of multi-protein DNA complexes, so how long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) regulate DNA repair is less well understood. Yet, lncRNA LINP1 is over-expressed in multiple cancers and confers resistance to ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs. Here, we unveil structural and mechanistic insights into LINP1's ability to facilitate non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). We characterized LINP1 structure and flexibility and analyzed interactions with the NHEJ factor Ku70/Ku80 (Ku) and Ku complexes that direct NHEJ. LINP1 self-assembles into phase-separated condensates via RNA-RNA interactions that reorganize to form filamentous Ku-containing aggregates. Structured motifs in LINP1 bind Ku, promoting Ku multimerization and stabilization of the initial synaptic event for NHEJ. Significantly, LINP1 acts as an effective proxy for PAXX. Collective results reveal how lncRNA effectively replaces a DNA repair protein for efficient NHEJ with implications for development of resistance to cancer therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available