4.6 Review

Tip-to-base xylem conduit widening as an adaptation: causes, consequences, and empirical priorities

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 229, Issue 4, Pages 1877-1893

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16961

Keywords

adaptation; allometry; conduit taper; developmental constraint; hydraulic architecture; plant hydraulics; tracheids; vessels

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1557906]
  2. DOE TES Award [DESC0019037]
  3. Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, UNAM [IN210719]
  4. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico [A1-S-26934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on terrestrial vascular plants shows that the diameter of xylem water-conducting conduits widens predictably with distance from the stem tip, which is likely an adaptation to minimize hydraulic resistance as the stem grows longer. This adaptive explanation is supported by optimality models predicting the observed pattern and is more consistent with data compared to nonadaptive explanations like temperature, drought, or turgor limitations.
In the stems of terrestrial vascular plants studied to date, the diameter of xylem water-conducting conduits D widens predictably with distance from the stem tip L approximating D proportional to L-b, with b approximate to 0.2. Because conduit diameter is central for conductance, it is essential to understand the cause of this remarkably pervasive pattern. We give reason to suspect that tip-to-base conduit widening is an adaptation, favored by natural selection because widening helps minimize the increase in hydraulic resistance that would otherwise occur as an individual stem grows longer and conductive path length increases. Evidence consistent with adaptation includes optimality models that predict the 0.2 exponent. The fact that this prediction can be made with a simple model of a single capillary, omitting much biological detail, itself makes numerous important predictions, e.g. that pit resistance must scale isometrically with conduit resistance. The idea that tip-to-base conduit widening has a nonadaptive cause, with temperature, drought, or turgor limiting the conduit diameters that plants are able to produce, is less consistent with the data than an adaptive explanation. We identify empirical priorities for testing the cause of tip-to-base conduit widening and underscore the need to study plant hydraulic systems leaf to root as integrated wholes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available