4.4 Review

Influence of first-pass effect on recanalization outcomes in the era of mechanical thrombectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages 795-807

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02586-7

Keywords

Acute ischemic stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy; First-pass effect; Multiple-pass effect; Recanalization outcomes; Systematic review

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2016YFC1301703]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the safety and efficacy of first-pass effect (FPE) and multiple-pass effect (MPE) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), with results indicating that FPE is associated with better outcomes after successful or complete recanalization.
Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis summarized the current literature to compare the safety and efficacy between first-pass effect (FPE) and multiple-pass effect (MPE) for thrombectomy in treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods Major databases were searched for studies which reported clinical outcomes regarding successful or complete recanalization after first pass of mechanical thrombectomy in AIS. The assessment of bias was performed using different scales.I(2)statistic was used to evaluate heterogeneity between reviewers. Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Visualization of funnel plots was used to evaluate publication bias. Results A total of 9 studies were eligible for final analysis. For successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), favorable outcomes were seen in 49.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.5-58.9%) and 34.7% (95% CI: 26.8-42.7%) of FPE and MPE patients, respectively. Mortality at 3 months was 13.8% (95% CI: 10.8-16.9%) and 26.0% (95% CI: 17.7-34.2%), respectively. For complete recanalization (mTICI 2c-3), proportion of favorable outcomes were 62.7% (95% CI: 51.2-74.2%) and 47.7% (95% CI: 37.4-58.0%) in FPE and MPE; mortality was seen in 11.5% (95% CI: 4.9-18.2%) and 17.0% (95% CI: 5.2-28.7%), respectively. For AIS with successful recanalization, FPE had more favorable outcome (odds ratio (OR): 1.85, 95% CI: 1.48-2.30;p < 0.01;I-2 = 0%) and lower mortality than MPE (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42-0.79;p = 0.001;I-2 = 61.9%). Similar results were seen in a subgroup analysis of patients with complete recanalization, with FPE having better outcome (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.40-2.28;p < 0.01;I-2 = 0%) and lower mortality risk (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.86;p = 0.005;I-2 = 0%) compared to MPE. Conclusion FPE is associated with better outcomes than MPE after achieving successful or complete recanalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available