4.6 Article

Cost Associated With Pediatric Delirium in the ICU

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages E1175-E1179

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002004

Keywords

costs; critical care; delirium; economic analysis; pediatric

Funding

  1. Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program
  2. Clinical Translational Science Center [UL1-TR000457-06]
  3. Empire Clinical Research Investigator Program (ECRIP)
  4. Clinical Translational Science Center (CTSC) [UL1-TR000457-06]
  5. ECRIP
  6. CTSC [UL1-TR000457-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the costs associated with delirium in critically ill children. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: An urban, academic, tertiary-care PICU in New York city. Patients: Four-hundred and sixty-four consecutive PICU admissions between September 2, 2014, and December 12, 2014. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: All children were assessed for delirium daily throughout their PICU stay. Hospital costs were analyzed using cost- to-charge ratios, in 2014 dollars. Median total PICU costs were higher in patients with delirium than in patients who were never delirious ($18,832 vs $4,803; p < 0.0001). Costs increased incrementally with number of days spent delirious (median cost of $9,173 for 1 d with delirium, $19,682 for 2-3 d with delirium, and $75,833 for > 3 d with delirium; p < 0.0001); this remained highly significant even after adjusting for PICU length of stay (p < 0.0001). After controlling for age, gender, severity of illness, and PICU length of stay, delirium was associated with an 85% increase in PICU costs (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Pediatric delirium is associated with a major increase in PICU costs. Further research directed at prevention and treatment of pediatric delirium is essential to improve outcomes in this population and could lead to substantial healthcare savings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available