4.7 Article

DEPDC5 haploinsufficiency drives increased mTORC1 signaling and abnormal morphology in human iPSC-derived cortical neurons

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104975

Keywords

Induced pluripotent stem cells; Disease modeling; mTOR; Epilepsy; Molecular genetics; Neurodevelopment; Neuronal differentiation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS083710, TR002097-03, NS096238]
  2. CDMRP/DOD [TS-150037]
  3. Michael David Greene Brain Cancer Fund
  4. VICC Ambassadors award
  5. Southeastern Brain Tumor Foundation
  6. Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center [P30-CA68485]
  7. Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Research Center [DK058404]
  8. [T32-GM007347]
  9. [T32-HD007502]
  10. [2T32-CA009592]
  11. [F31-NS096908]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the DEPDC5 gene can cause epilepsy, including forms with and without brain malformations. The goal of this study was to investigate the contribution of DEPDC5 gene dosage to the underlying neuropathology of DEPDC5-related epilepsies. We generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from epilepsy patients harboring heterozygous loss of function mutations in DEPDC5. Patient iPSCs displayed increases in both phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 and proliferation rate, consistent with elevated mTORC1 activation. In line with these findings, we observed increased soma size in patient iPSC-derived cortical neurons that was rescued with rapamycin treatment. These data indicate that human cells heterozygous for DEPDC5 loss-of-function mutations are haploinsufficient for control of mTORC1 signaling. Our findings suggest that human pathology differs from mouse models of DEPDC5-related epilepsies, which do not show consistent phenotypic differences in heterozygous neurons, and support the need for human-based models to affirm and augment the findings from animal models of DEPDC5-related epilepsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available