4.6 Article

CGA: a new feature selection model for visual human action recognition

Journal

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 5267-5286

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-05297-5

Keywords

Human action recognition; Cooperative genetic algorithm; Feature selection; Coalition game; Pearson correlation coefficient; Weizmann; KTH; UCF11; HMDB51; UCI HAR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper proposes a novel feature selection model named CGA, which utilizes cooperative genetic algorithm to extract important features from a large feature set, leading to improved classification accuracy and reduced time requirement. Experiments show significant enhancement in overall classification accuracy with only a small portion of the original feature vector considered.
Recognition of human actions from visual contents is a budding field of computer vision and image understanding. The problem with such a recognition system is the huge dimensions of the feature vectors. Many of these features are irrelevant to the classification mechanism. For this reason, in this paper, we propose a novel feature selection (FS) model called cooperative genetic algorithm (CGA) to select some of the most important and discriminating features from the entire feature set to improve the classification accuracy as well as the time requirement of the activity recognition mechanism. In CGA, we have made an effort to embed the concepts of cooperative game theory in GA to create a both-way reinforcement mechanism to improve the solution of the FS model. The proposed FS model is tested on four benchmark video datasets named Weizmann, KTH, UCF11, HMDB51, and two sensor-based UCI HAR datasets. The experiments are conducted using four state-of-the-art feature descriptors, namely HOG, GLCM, SURF, and GIST. It is found that there is a significant improvement in the overall classification accuracy while considering very small fraction of the original feature vector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available