4.7 Review

Extreme heterogeneity of human mitochondrial DNA from organelles to populations

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 106-118

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-020-00284-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. United Mitochondrial Disease Foundation
  3. UK Medical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit [MC_UU_00015/9]
  4. Medical Research Council International Centre for Genomic Medicine in Neuromuscular Disease
  5. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2018-408]
  6. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  7. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at University of Cambridge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep resequencing has revealed extreme genetic variation in mitochondrial genomes at multiple levels, shedding light on the origins of human mitochondrial DNA mutations and their impact on rare and common human diseases, including cancer.
Contrary to the long-held view that most humans harbour only identical mitochondrial genomes, deep resequencing has uncovered unanticipated extreme genetic variation within mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Most, if not all, humans contain multiple mtDNA genotypes (heteroplasmy); specific patterns of variants accumulate in different tissues, including cancers, over time; and some variants are preferentially passed down or suppressed in the maternal germ line. These findings cast light on the origin and spread of mtDNA mutations at multiple scales, from the organelle to the human population, and challenge the conventional view that high percentages of a mutation are required before a new variant has functional consequences. Deep resequencing has revealed extreme genetic variation in mitochondrial genomes at multiple levels. This heterogeneity has implications for the origins of human mitochondrial DNA mutations as well as their impact on rare and common human diseases, including cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available