4.7 Article

Jointly defining cell types from multiple single-cell datasets using LIGER

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-0391-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 AI149669, R01 HG010883, U19 1U19MH114821]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, the authors describe step-by-step procedures for integrating single-cell sequencing datasets from different experiments or modalities to identify common and distinct cell types using the R-based software tool LIGER. High-throughput single-cell sequencing technologies hold tremendous potential for defining cell types in an unbiased fashion using gene expression and epigenomic state. A key challenge in realizing this potential is integrating single-cell datasets from multiple protocols, biological contexts, and data modalities into a joint definition of cellular identity. We previously developed an approach, called linked inference of genomic experimental relationships (LIGER), that uses integrative nonnegative matrix factorization to address this challenge. Here, we provide a step-by-step protocol for using LIGER to jointly define cell types from multiple single-cell datasets. The main stages of the protocol are data preprocessing and normalization, joint factorization, quantile normalization and joint clustering, and visualization. We describe how to jointly define cell types from single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and single-nucleus ATAC-seq (snATAC-seq) data, but similar steps apply across a wide range of other settings and data types, including cross-species analysis, single-nucleus DNA methylation, and spatial transcriptomics. Our protocol contains examples of expected results, describes common pitfalls, and relies only on our freely available, open-source R implementation of LIGER. We also provide R Markdown tutorials showing the outputs from each individual code segment. The analysis process can be performed in 1-4 h, depending on dataset size, and assumes no specialized bioinformatics training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available