4.8 Article

Continuous versus intermittent BRAF and MEK inhibition in patients withBRAF-mutated melanoma: a randomized phase 2 trial

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages 1564-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1060-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute's Cancer Therapeutics Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP)
  2. NCI/NIH [CA180888, CA180819, CA180820, CA180850, CA239767, CA189808, CA46282, CA189858, CA189830, CA233230, CA189829, CA189954, CA189860, CA189822, CA189953, CA180834, CA189809, CA189957, CA189958, R35 CA197633, P01 CA244118]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The randomized phase 2 trial S1320 comparing different dosing schedules of BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination inBRAF-mutated advanced melanoma shows intermittent therapy does not result in superior progression-free survival in patients. Preclinical modeling suggests that intermittent BRAF inhibitor therapy may delay acquired resistance when blocking oncogenicBRAF(V600)in melanoma(1,2). We conducted S1320, a randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02196181) evaluating whether intermittent dosing of the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib improves progression-free survival in patients with metastatic and unresectableBRAF(V600)melanoma. Patients were enrolled at 68 academic and community sites nationally. All patients received continuous dabrafenib and trametinib during an 8-week lead-in period, after which patients with non-progressing tumors were randomized to either continuous or intermittent dosing of both drugs on a 3-week-off, 5-week-on schedule. The trial has completed accrual and 206 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomized 1:1 to the two study arms (105 to continuous dosing, 101 to intermittent dosing). Continuous dosing yielded a statistically significant improvement in post-randomization progression-free survival compared with intermittent dosing (median 9.0 months versus 5.5 months,P = 0.064, pre-specified two-sided alpha = 0.2). Therefore, contrary to the initial hypothesis, intermittent dosing did not improve progression-free survival in patients. There were no differences in the secondary outcomes, including overall survival and the overall incidence of treatment-associated toxicity, between the two groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available