4.8 Article

NSD1-deposited H3K36me2 directs de novo methylation in the mouse male germline and counteracts Polycomb-associated silencing

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 1088-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0689-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Platform Project for Supporting Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (Basis for Supporting Innovative Drug Discovery and Life Science Research (BINDS)) from AMED (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development) [JP20am0101103, 1080]
  2. CIHR grants [PJT-153049, PJT-166170]
  3. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  4. CIHR Banting postdoctoral fellowship [BPF-156568]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

De novo DNA methylation (DNAme) in mammalian germ cells is dependent on DNMT3A and DNMT3L. However, oocytes and spermatozoa show distinct patterns of DNAme. In mouse oocytes, de novo DNAme requires the lysine methyltransferase (KMTase) SETD2, which deposits H3K36me3. We show here that SETD2 is dispensable for de novo DNAme in the male germline. Instead, the lysine methyltransferase NSD1, which broadly deposits H3K36me2 in euchromatic regions, plays a critical role in de novo DNAme in prospermatogonia, including at imprinted genes. However, males deficient in germline NSD1 show a more severe defect in spermatogenesis thanDnmt3l(-/-)males. Notably, unlike DNMT3L, NSD1 safeguards a subset of genes against H3K27me3-associated transcriptional silencing. In contrast, H3K36me2 in oocytes is predominantly dependent on SETD2 and coincides with H3K36me3. Furthermore, females with NSD1-deficient oocytes are fertile. Thus, the sexually dimorphic pattern of DNAme in mature mouse gametes is orchestrated by distinct profiles of H3K36 methylation. NSD1, which deposits H3K36me2, is a major regulator of DNA methylation in male but not in female gametogenesis. NSD1 safeguards against H3K27me3-associated transcriptional silencing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available