4.8 Article

Competing magnetic states in silicene and germanene 2D ferromagnets

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 3396-3402

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-3027-y

Keywords

silicene; germanene; 2D ferromagnetism; X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD); monolayer

Funding

  1. National Research Center (NRC) Kurchatov Institute [1359]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-19-00009, 20-79-10028]
  3. President's scholarship [SP 1398.2019.5]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [19-19-00009, 20-79-10028] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimension (2D) magnets have recently developed into a class of stoichiometric materials with prospective applications in ultra-compact spintronics and quantum computing. Their functionality is particularly rich when different magnetic orders are competing in the same material. Metalloxenes REX2(RE = Eu, Gd; X = Si, Ge), silicene or germanene - heavy counterparts of graphene - coupled with a layer of rare-earth metals, evolve from three-dimension (3D) antiferromagnets in multilayer structures to 2D ferromagnets in a few monolayers. This evolution, however, does not lead to fully saturated 2D ferromagnetism, pointing at a possibility of coexisting/competing magnetic states. Here, REX(2)magnetism is explored with element-selective X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD). The measurements are carried out for GdSi2, EuSi2, GdGe2, and EuGe(2)of different thicknesses down to 1 monolayer employing K absorption edges of Si and Ge as well as M and L edges of the rare-earths. They access the magnetic state in REX(2)and determine the seat of magnetism, orbital, and spin contributions to the magnetic moment. High-field measurements probe remnants of the bulk antiferromagnetism in 2D REX2. The results provide a new platform for studies of complex magnetic structures in 2D materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available