4.6 Article

Scale-space multi-view bag of words for scene categorization

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 1223-1245

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09759-9

Keywords

Scene categorization; Bag of words; Scale-space features; Feature fusion; TF-IDF weighting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduced a Scale-Space Multi-View Bag of Words (SSMV-BoW) method to address common limitations in image categorization tasks by considering spatial and semantic information as well as information from multiple views. Experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of this method compared to others.
As a widely-used method in the image categorization tasks, the Bag-of-Words (BoW) method still suffers from many limitations such as overlooking spatial information. In this paper, we propose four improvements to the BoW method to consider spatial and semantic information as well as information from multiple views. In particular, our contributions are: (a) encoding spatial information based on a combination of wavelet transform image scaling and a new image partitioning scheme, (b) proposing a spatial-information- and content-aware visual word dictionary generation approach, (c) developing a content-aware feature weighting approach to considers the significance of the features for different semantics, (d) proposing a novel weighting strategy to fuse color information when discriminative shape features are lacking. We call our method Scale-Space Multi-View Bag of Words (SSMV-BoW). We conducted extensive experiments to evaluate our SSMV-BoW and compare it to the state-of-the-art scene categorization methods. For our experiments, we use four publicly available and widely used scene categorization benchmark datasets. Results demonstrate that our SSMV-BoW outperforms the methods using both hand-crafted and deep learning features. In addition, ablation studies show that all four improvements contribute to the performance of our SSMV-BoW.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available