4.7 Article

Missing [C II] emission from early galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 499, Issue 4, Pages 5136-5150

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3178

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: ISM

Funding

  1. ERC Advanced Grant INTERSTELLAR [H2020/740120]
  2. ERC [695671]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
  4. INAF [1.05.01.86.31]
  5. STFC [ST/M001172/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ALMA observations have revealed that [C II] 158 mu m line emission in high-z galaxies is approximate to 2-3 x more extended than the UV continuum emission. Here we explore whether surface brightness dimming (SBD) of the [C II] line is responsible for the reported [C II] deficit, and the large L-[O III]/L-[C II] luminosity ratio measured in early galaxies. We first analyse archival ALMA images of nine z > 6 galaxies observed in both [C II] and [O III]. After performing several uv-tapering experiments to optimize the identification of extended line emission, we detect [C II] emission in the whole sample, with an extent systematically larger than the [OIII] emission. Next, we use interferometric simulations to study the effect of SBD on the line luminosity estimate. About 40 per cent of the extended [C II] component might be missed at an angular resolution of 0.8 arcsec, implying that L-[C II] is underestimated by a factor approximate to 2 in data at low (<7) signal-to-noise ratio. By combining these results, we conclude that L-[C II] of z > 6 galaxies lies, on average, slightly below the local L-[C II] - SFR relation (Delta(z) = 6-9 = -0.07 +/- 0.3), but within the intrinsic dispersion of the relation. SBD correction also yields L-[O III]/L-[C II] < 10, i.e. more in line with current hydrodynamical simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available