4.7 Article

The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: N-body mock challenge for the quasar sample

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 499, Issue 1, Pages 269-291

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2825

Keywords

methods: data analysis; catalogues; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. NILAC
  2. European Research Council through the COSFORM Research Grant [670193]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST) [2017R1E1A1A01077508, 2020R1A2C1005655]
  4. faculty research fund of Sejong University
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  6. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  7. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  8. Brazilian Participation Group
  9. Carnegie Institution for Science
  10. Carnegie Mellon University
  11. Chilean Participation Group
  12. French Participation Group
  13. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  14. Instituto de Astrofiisica de Canarias
  15. Johns Hopkins University
  16. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  17. Korean Participation Group
  18. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  19. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  20. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  21. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  22. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  23. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  24. New Mexico State University
  25. New York University
  26. University of Notre Dame
  27. Observatario Nacional/MCTI
  28. Ohio State University
  29. Pennsylvania State University
  30. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  31. United Kingdom Participation Group
  32. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  33. University of Arizona
  34. University of Colorado Boulder
  35. University of Oxford
  36. University of Portsmouth
  37. University of Utah
  38. University of Virginia
  39. University of Washington
  40. University of Wisconsin
  41. Vanderbilt University
  42. Yale University
  43. BEIS capital funding via STFC capital grants [ST/K00042X/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1, ST/S002502/1]
  44. Durham University
  45. STFC operations grant [ST/R000832/1]
  46. [ANR-16-CE31-0021]
  47. [ANR-17-CE31-0024-01]
  48. STFC [ST/R000832/1, ST/K00042X/1, ST/S002502/1, ST/P002293/1, ST/R002371/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth rate and expansion history of the Universe can be measured from large galaxy redshift surveys using the Alcock-Paczynski effect. We validate the Redshift Space Distortion models used in the final analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) Data Release 16 quasar clustering sample, in configuration and Fourier space, using a series of halo occupation distribution mock catalogues generated using the OuterRim N-body simulation. We test three models on a series of non-blind mocks, in the OuterRim cosmology, and blind mocks, which have been rescaled to new cosmologies, and investigate the effects of redshift smearing and catastrophic redshifts. We find that for the non-blind mocks, the models are able to recover fs8 to within 3 per cent and alpha(parallel to) and alpha(perpendicular to) to within 1 per cent. The scatter in the measurements is larger for the blind mocks, due to the assumption of an incorrect fiducial cosmology. From this mock challenge, we find that all three models perform well, with similar systematic errors on f sigma(8), alpha(parallel to), and alpha(perpendicular to) at the level of sigma f sigma(8) = 0.013, sigma(alpha parallel to) = 0.012, and sigma(alpha perpendicular to) = 0.008. The systematic error on the combined consensus is sigma f sigma(8) = 0.011, sigma(a) = 0.008, and sa. = 0.005, which is used in the final DR16 analysis. For baryon acoustic oscillation fits in configuration and Fourier space, we take conservative systematic errors of sigma(alpha parallel to) = 0.010 and sigma(alpha perpendicular to) = 0.007.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available