4.7 Article

A thousand days after the merger: Continued X-ray emission from GW170817

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 498, Issue 4, Pages 5643-5651

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2626

Keywords

gravitational waves; gamma-ray burst: individual: GRB170817A; neutron star mergers

Funding

  1. Australian Government
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration through Chandra Award [G0920071A, NAS8-03060]
  3. University of Maryland through the Joint Space Science Institute Prize Post-doctoral Fellowship
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX16AB66G, NNX17AB18G, 80NSSC20K0389]
  5. European Union Horizon 2020 Programme under the AHEAD2020 project [871158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent observations with the Chandra X-ray telescope continue to detect X-ray emission from the transient GW170817. In a total exposure of 96.6 ks, performed between 2020 March 9 and 16 (935-942 d after the merger), a total of 8 photons are measured at the source position, corresponding to a significance of approximate to 5 sigma. Radio monitoring with the Australian Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) shows instead that the source has faded below our detection threshold (<33 mu Jy, 3 sigma). By assuming a constant spectral index of beta = 0.585, we derive an unabsorbed X-ray flux of approximate to 1.4 x 10(-15) erg cm(-2) s(-1), higher than earlier predictions, yet still consistent with a simple structured jet model. We discuss possible scenarios that could account for prolonged emission in X-rays. The current data set appears consistent both with energy injection by a long-lived central engine and with the onset of a kilonova afterglow, arising from the interaction of the sub-relativistic merger ejecta with the surrounding medium. Long-term monitoring of this source will be essential to test these different models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available