4.7 Review

Unraveling the 3D Genome Architecture in Plants: Present and Future

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1676-1693

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.10.002

Keywords

3D genomic methods; plant 3D genome; dynamic chromatin organization; liquid-liquid phase separation; RNA-chromatin interaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771422, 31771402]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100904]
  3. National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement [ZK201906]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The eukaryotic genome has a hierarchical three-dimensional (3D) organization with functional implications for DNA replication, DNA repair, and transcriptional regulation. Over the past decade, scientists have endeavored to elucidate the spatial characteristics and functions of plant genome architecture using high-throughput chromatin conformation capturing technologies such as Hi-C, ChIA-PET, and HiChIP. Here, we systematically review current understanding of chromatin organization in plants at multiple scales. We also discuss the emerging opinions and concepts in 3D genome research, focusing on state-of-the-art 3D genome techniques, RNA-chromatin interactions, liquid-liquid phase separation, and dynamic chromatin alterations. We propose the application of single-cell/single-molecule multi-omics, multiway (DNA-DNA, DNA-RNA, and RNA-RNA interactions) chromatin conformation capturing methods, and proximity ligation-independent 3D genome-mapping technologies to explore chromatin organization structure and function in plants. Such methods could reveal the spatial interactions between trait-related SNPs and their target genes at various spatiotemporal resolutions, and elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the interactions among DNA elements, RNA molecules, and protein factors during the formation of key traits in plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available