4.6 Article

Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins: Implications in Neurological Diseases

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 631-646

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-020-02137-4

Keywords

hnRNPs; Alzheimer's disease; Multiple sclerosis; ALS; FTD

Categories

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Research UK senior fellowship
  2. Reta Lila Weston Institute of Neurological Studies, UCL Institute of Neurology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) play diverse roles in RNA regulation and have implications in neurological diseases, although evidence is still emerging. Understanding their involvement in neurological diseases can shed light on pathomechanisms and potentially advance therapeutic interventions.
Heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are a complex and functionally diverse family of RNA binding proteins with multifarious roles. They are involved, directly or indirectly, in alternative splicing, transcriptional and translational regulation, stress granule formation, cell cycle regulation, and axonal transport. It is unsurprising, given their heavy involvement in maintaining functional integrity of the cell, that their dysfunction has neurological implications. However, compared to their more established roles in cancer, the evidence of hnRNP implication in neurological diseases is still in its infancy. This review aims to consolidate the evidences for hnRNP involvement in neurological diseases, with a focus on spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), multiple sclerosis (MS), congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS), and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Understanding more about hnRNP involvement in neurological diseases can further elucidate the pathomechanisms involved in these diseases and perhaps guide future therapeutic advances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available