4.7 Article

Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 13, Pages 3239-3251

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.15597

Keywords

biomonitoring; eDNA; macroinvertebrates; metabarcoding; streams

Funding

  1. Canada First Research Excellence Fund
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although both bulk tissue metabarcoding and eDNA metabarcoding can detect differences between stream communities, bulk tissue metabarcoding provides a more accurate representation of local stream macroinvertebrate communities and is preferable when smaller-scale spatial resolution is important.
Freshwater biomonitoring programmes routinely sample aquatic macroinvertebrates. These samples are time-consuming to collect, as well as challenging and costly to identify reliably genus or species. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has emerged as a surrogate to traditional collection techniques and has been used in whole-community approaches across several taxa and ecosystems. However, the usefulness of eDNA-based detection of freshwater macroinvertebrates has not been extensively explored. Few studies have directly compared bulk sample and eDNA metabarcoding at a local scale to assess how effective each method is at characterizing aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Here, we collected both eDNA and kicknet samples at the same sample transect locations across nine different streams in southern Ontario, Canada. We observed minimal overlap in community composition between these paired samples. Bulk tissue metabarcoding resulted in a greater proportion of sequences belonging to metazoan taxa (over 99%) than eDNA (12%) and had higher OTU richness for macroinvertebrate taxa. We suggest that degenerate primers are not effective for eDNA metabarcoding due to the high degree of nontarget amplification and subsequently low yield of target DNA. While both bulk sample and eDNA metabarcoding had the power to detect differences between stream communities, eDNA did not represent local communities. Bulk tissue metabarcoding thus provides a more accurate representation of local stream macroinvertebrate communities and is the preferred method if smaller-scale spatial resolution is an important factor in data analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available