4.4 Article

Regulation of meiotic progression by Sertoli-cell androgen signaling

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
Volume 31, Issue 25, Pages 2841-2862

Publisher

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E20-05-0334

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [HD33816, 1R21HD090371-01A1, 1DP2HD091949-01, F30HD097961]
  2. Michigan Institute for Data Science (MIDAS) grant
  3. NIH [P30 CA034196]
  4. CTRB [5T32HD079342-04]
  5. MSTP [5T32GM007863-38]
  6. Open Philanthropy Grant [2019-199327 (5384)]
  7. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [F30HD097961] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling in Sertoli cells is known to be important for germ-cell progression through meiosis, but the extent to which androgens indirectly regulate specific meiotic stages is not known. Here, we combine synchronization of spermatogenesis, cytological analyses and single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) in the Sertoli-cell androgen receptor knockout (SCARKO) mutant and control mice, and demonstrate that SCARKO mutant spermatocytes exhibited normal expression and localization of key protein markers of meiotic prophase events, indicating that initiation of meiotic prophase is not androgen dependent. However, spermatocytes from SCARKO testes failed to acquire competence for the meiotic division phase. ScRNAseq analysis of wild-type and SCARKO mutant testes revealed a molecular transcriptomic block in an early meiotic prophase state (leptotene/zygotene) in mutant germ cells, and identified several misregulated genes in SCARKO Sertoli cells, many of which have been previously implicated in male infertility. Together, our coordinated cytological and scRNAseq analyses identified germ-cell intrinsic and extrinsic genes responsive to Sertoli-cell androgen signaling that promotes cellular states permissive for the meiotic division phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available