4.5 Article

Retinal characterization in the eyes of two bats endemic in the Egyptian fauna, the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and insectivorous bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii), using the light microscope and transmission electron microscope

Journal

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
Volume 83, Issue 11, Pages 1391-1400

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23530

Keywords

choroidal papillae; Egyptian fruit bat; insectivorous bat; photoreceptor cells; retina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bats are the only mammals that can fly in the dark without eye usage. This study was conducted to describe the structural and functional adaptations of the retina of two bats very common in the Egyptian fauna having a different lifestyle: the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) and insectivorous bat (Pipistrellus kuhlii). Seven eyes were collected from adult individuals of each species. Examination of the retina using a light microscope and a transmission electron microscope was carried out. The retina ofP. kuhliiwas thicker than that ofR. aegyptiacus, which had many projections extended from the choroid layer into retina forming papillae. Despite rods being dominant in retinae of both species, cone photoreceptors were encountered in both retinae. The outer plexiform layer ofR. aegyptiacuswas arranged into islets between the outer nuclear layer produced differences in its thickness. However, the retina ofP. kuhliishowed a normal arrangement of retinal structure. The retinal pigment epithelium of both bat species consists of a single layer of the cuboidal cells with a round to oval vesicular nuclei, which showed a lack of pigmentation inR. aegyptiacusand poor pigmentation in theP. kuhlii. In conclusion, our investigation detected many structural and ultrastructural differences between the two bat species. The presence of many projections protruded from the choroid layer ofR. aegyptiacusretina is considered the most characteristic difference between the retinae ofR. aegyptiacusandP. kuhlii.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available