4.4 Article

A study of greyscale electron beam lithography for a 3D round shape Kinoform lens for hard X-ray optics

Journal

MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2020.111435

Keywords

Round Kinoform lens; Hard X-ray focusing/imaging; Grayscale e-beam lithography; Monte Carlo simulation; Proximity effect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1732104, 61927820]
  2. Shanghai STCSM project [19142202700]
  3. open project of SITP [IIMDKFJJ-18-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For high quality imaging of materials in nanoscale by hard X-ray optics, high resolution lenses with high focusing/imaging efficiency are needed. Refraction based conventional Kinoform lenses with 1D linear configuration in Si has been attempted for decades, but there has still been no sign of success due to the enormous difficulty in fabrication. This paper proposes a novel configuration of golden Kinoform lenses with round shape on a plate, in which each zone maintains the typical 3D parabolic profile as seen in the traditional 1D counterpart. The major focus in this work is on the generation of the 3D profile in e-beam resist through greyscale electron beam lithography (EBL) as the template for the golden Kinoform lens. Systematic study of the greyscale lithography conditions, including the comparisons of resists, developers and charge distributions, has been conducted by using Monte Carlo simulation as well as e-beam lithography. Initial results have been achieved for replicating the desired 3D profile of the golden Kinoform lens in the resist. Using the generated profile in resist as templates, the golden Kinoform lens with 200 mu m diameter and 3.5 mu m height has been successfully fabricated, for the first time, which will hopefully replace the existing Fresnel zone plates for hard X-ray imaging with high resolution and high efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available