4.6 Article

Creep Behavior of ZK60 Alloy and ZK60/SiCw Composite After Extrusion and Precipitation Hardening

Journal

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 3905-3917

Publisher

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-020-00877-5

Keywords

ZK60/SiCw composite; Accelerated creep test; Dynamic precipitation; Double twinning; Grain boundary sliding; Dislocation creep

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The creep properties of ZK60 alloy and ZK60/SiCw composite were studied after extrusion and precipitation hardening using accelerated creep tests. Different stress exponents were observed for the alloy and composite at low and high stresses, indicating a shift in creep mechanism from grain boundary sliding to dislocation creep. Fracture surface examination showed that cavity nucleation around grain corners and precipitates was the main cause of creep failure.
Creep properties of ZK60 alloy and ZK60/SiCw composite have been investigated after extrusion and precipitation hardening by accelerated creep test. Creep tests were conducted at 150 degrees C in the stress range of 10-120 MPa. At low stresses, the stress exponents of 1.93 and 1.75 were obtained for the unreinforced alloy and the composite, respectively. Stress exponents of the unreinforced alloy and composite sample were 5.82 and 7.07, respectively, at high stresses. The creep mechanism changed by increasing the stress from grain boundary sliding (GBS) to dislocation creep due to the fact that the average true creep activation energy changed from 55 to 95.06 kJ/mol. Based on the microstructural observations, at low stresses, the grain refinement induced by twinning caused the GBS mechanism. However, at high stresses, slip changed from basal planes to the pyramidal secondary slip system which was associated with increase in twin density. Examination of the fracture surfaces revealed that cavity nucleation in the grain corners and around the precipitates was the main reason for creep failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available