4.7 Review

Targeting hepatocyte growth factor/c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor axis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Rationale and therapeutic strategies

Journal

MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 507-524

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/med.21738

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatocyte growth factor; c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR [CUHK14117015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with current treatments showing unsatisfactory outcomes. The HGF/c-Met axis is considered crucial in regulating liver diseases and promoting HCC, and inhibiting this pathway may lead to the development of new and effective treatments for HCC.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The outcome of current standard treatments, as well as targeted therapies in advanced stages, are still unsatisfactory. Attention has been drawn to novel strategies for better treatment efficacy. Hepatocyte growth factor/c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (HGF/c-Met) axis has been known as an essential element in the regulation of liver diseases and as an oncogenic factor in HCC. In this review, we collected the evidence of HGF/c-Met as a tumor progression and prognostic marker, discussed the anti-c-Met therapy in vitro, summarized the outcome of c-Met inhibitors in clinical trials, and identified potential impetus for future anti-c-Met treatments. We also analyzed the inconsistency of HGF/c-Met from various publications and offered reasonable explanations based on the current understanding in this area. In conclusion, HGF/c-Met plays a crucial role in the progression and growth of HCC, and the strategies to inhibit this pathway may facilitate the development of new and effective treatments for HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available