4.7 Article

AI-driven quantification, staging and outcome prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101860

Keywords

COVID 19 pneumonia; Artifial intelligence; Deep learning; Staging; Prognosis; Biomarker discovery; Ensemble methods

Funding

  1. European Union [880314]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM) [DIC20161236437]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [188153]
  4. GE Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study examines the use of medical imaging and artificial intelligence for disease quantification, staging, and outcome prediction of COVID-19. The approach relies on automatic deep learning-based disease quantification and a data-driven consensus for staging and outcome prediction of patients. Promising results and comparisons with expert human readers demonstrate the potentials of the approach.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in 2019 and disseminated around the world rapidly. Computed tomography (CT) imaging has been proven to be an important tool for screening, disease quantification and staging. The latter is of extreme importance for organizational anticipation (availability of intensive care unit beds, patient management planning) as well as to accelerate drug development through rapid, reproducible and quantified assessment of treatment response. Even if currently there are no specific guidelines for the staging of the patients, CT together with some clinical and biological biomarkers are used. In this study, we collected a multi-center cohort and we investigated the use of medical imaging and artificial intelligence for disease quantification, staging and outcome prediction. Our approach relies on automatic deep learning-based disease quantification using an ensemble of architectures, and a data driven consensus for the staging and outcome prediction of the patients fusing imaging biomarkers with clinical and biological attributes. Highly promising results on multiple external/independent evaluation cohorts as well as comparisons with expert human readers demonstrate the potentials of our approach. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available