4.4 Article

Identifiability of linear compartmental models: the effect of moving inputs, outputs, and leaks

Journal

LINEAR & MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA
Volume 70, Issue 14, Pages 2782-2803

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03081087.2020.1812497

Keywords

Identifiability; linear compartmental models; input-output equation; cycle model

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation - NSF [DMS-1752672, DMS-1757872]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigate whether local and generic identifiability is preserved in linear compartmental models when parts of the model, such as inputs, outputs, leaks, and edges, are moved, added, or deleted. Our findings show that for certain catenary, cycle, and mammillary models, moving or deleting the leak preserves identifiability. Additionally, for cycle models with up to one leak, moving inputs or outputs also preserves identifiability.
A mathematical model is identifiable if its parameters can be recovered from data. Here we investigate, for linear compartmental models, whether (local, generic) identifiability is preserved when parts of the model - specifically, inputs, outputs, leaks, and edges - are moved, added, or deleted. Our results are as follows. First, for certain catenary, cycle, and mammillary models, moving or deleting the leak preserves identifiability. Next, for cycle models with up to one leak, moving inputs or outputs preserves identifiability. Thus, every cycle model with up to one leak (and at least one input and at least one output) is identifiable. Next, we give conditions under which adding leaks renders a cycle model unidentifiable. Finally, for certain cycle models with no leaks, adding specific edges again preserves identifiability. Our proofs, which are algebraic and combinatorial in nature, rely on results on elementary symmetric polynomials and the theory of input-output equations for linear compartmental models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available