4.5 Article

Quantification of Aerosol Concentrations During Endonasal Instrumentation in the Clinic Setting

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages E1415-E1421

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29122

Keywords

COVID-19; nasal endoscopy; aerosol-generating procedures; optical particle sizer; droplet quantification

Funding

  1. NIH [KL2TR002490]
  2. Howard Holderness Distinguished Medical Scholars program
  3. Pillsbury Medical Student Research Fellowship Grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent study examined aerosol generation during nasal endoscopy and found no significant increase in aerosol particles during diagnostic procedures in patients without need for debridement. However, in patients needing debridement, cold and suction instrumentation were associated with increased aerosol generation, with a trend observed during endoscope use prior to tissue manipulation.
Objective Recent anecdotal reports and cadaveric simulations have described aerosol generation during endonasal instrumentation, highlighting a possible risk for transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during endoscopic endonasal instrumentation. This study aims to provide a greater understanding of particle generation and exposure risk during endoscopic endonasal instrumentation. Study Design Prospective quantification of aerosol generation during office-based nasal endoscopy procedures. Methods Using an optical particle sizer, airborne particles concentrations 0.3 to 10 microns in diameter, were measured during 30 nasal endoscopies in the clinic setting. Measurements were taken at time points throughout diagnostic and debridement endoscopies and compared to preprocedure and empty room particle concentrations. Results No significant change in airborne particle concentrations was measured during diagnostic nasal endoscopies in patients without the need for debridement. However, significant increases in mean particle concentration compared to preprocedure levels were measured during cold instrumentation at 2,462 particles/foot(3)(95% CI 837 to 4,088;P= .005) and during suction use at 2,973 particle/foot(3)(95% CI 1,419 to 4,529;P= .001). In total, 99.2% of all measured particles were <= 1 mu m in diameter. Conclusion When measured with an optical particle sizer, diagnostic nasal endoscopy with a rigid endoscope is not associated with increased particle aerosolization in patient for whom sinonasal debridement is not needed. In patients needing sinonasal debridement, endonasal cold and suction instrumentation were associated with increased particle aerosolization, with a trend observed during endoscope use prior to tissue manipulation. Endonasal debridement may potentially pose a higher risk for aerosolization and SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Appropriate personal protective equipment use and patient screening are recommended for all office-based endonasal procedures. Level of Evidence 3Laryngoscope, 2020

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available