4.5 Review

Misperception of Visual Vertical in Peripheral Vestibular Disorders. A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages 1110-1121

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.29124

Keywords

Peripheral vestibular disorders; sense of verticality; subjective visual vertical; rod and frame test; multisensory integration; systematic review

Funding

  1. European Regional Development FUND (PO FEDER 2014-2020) [1263880]
  2. Ministry of Science, Innovation and University (Government of Spain) [FPU17/01619]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess the misperception of visual verticality in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders compared to healthy controls. Results from 34 studies showed that patients with PVD have a higher misperception of VV, particularly in the acute phase and after vestibular surgery.
Objective The main aim was to assess the misperception of visual verticality (VV) in patients with peripheral vestibular disorders (PVD) in comparison with healthy controls. As secondary objectives, we checked if vestibular, visual, and somatosensory postural pathways can be affected in patients with PVD as well as the characteristics of PVD that could influence on the VV perception. Methods A systematic review with meta-analysis was carried out. The bibliographic search was performed in January, 2020 in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), CINAHL, SciELO. Two reviewers selected the studies that met the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The VV perception was assessed in two meta-analysis according the used test: The Subjective Visual Vertical test (SVV) or the Rod and Frame Test (RFT) in comparison with healthy subjects. The Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) was used to estimate the pooled effect. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test and Trim and Fill Method. Results Thirty-four studies were included reporting 3,524 participants. PVD patients showed a misperception of the VV with SVV (SMD = 1.510; 95%CI: 1.190-1.830) and the RFT (SMD = 0.816; 95% CI: 0.234-1.398) respect healthy controls. A subgroup of patients in the acute phase (SMD = 2.5; 95%CI: 2.022-2.978) and who underwent a vestibular surgery (SMD = 2.241; 95%CI: 1.471-3.011) had the greater misperception of VV. Conclusion Patients with PVD show an alteration in the perception of VV, being greater in the acute phase and after a vestibular surgery.Laryngoscope, 2020

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available