4.4 Article

Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Journal

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Volume 406, Issue 2, Pages 437-447

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01996-8

Keywords

Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Oncological outcome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study confirms the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer, showing non-inferior oncological outcomes compared to open gastrectomy (OG) for both early and advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were similar between LAG and OG groups, with laparoscopy-assisted distal and total gastrectomy also producing comparable long-term outcomes in AGC patients.
Purpose Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) is proven by considerable studies as a safe procedure for early gastric cancer (EGC), but its long-term oncologic outcomes in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have not been well-described. This study aimed at verifying the non-inferiority of LAG in the treatment of EGC and comparing the oncological feasibility of LAG and open gastrectomy (OG) for AGC. Methods A total of 209 consecutive patients who underwent LAG or OG with D2 lymph node dissection between December 2008 and November 2012 were included. The survival rate was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and the risk factors affecting the survival and recurrence were evaluated with Cox regression models. Subgroup analysis was performed in AGC patients receiving both distal and total gastrectomy. Results Of 209 patients, 194 (92.8%; mean age, 62.7 years; 56 [28.9%] women) eligible patients were finally enrolled in this study. No significant differences in the number of lymph nodes retrieved and postoperative complications were observed between patients receiving LAG and OG. During a mean follow-up of 58.3 +/- 38.1 months (range 0-121 months), the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 56.1% and 53.0% for LAG, and 57.7% and 50.9% for OG. In the subgroup analysis for AGC, laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy did not result in inferior long-term outcomes, and recurrence was found in 49 patients (31.2%). Age more than 65 years and the advanced tumor stage were independent risk factors of survival. Conclusion LAG is a feasible and safe treatment for gastric cancer, with good oncologic results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available