4.7 Article

Mathematical models for devising the optimal SARS-CoV-2 strategy for eradication in China, South Korea, and Italy

Journal

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-020-02513-7

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Mathematical models; Hospital isolation

Funding

  1. National Special Research Program of China for Important Infectious Diseases [2018ZX10302103-003]
  2. [81672383]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), spreads rapidly and has attracted worldwide attention. Methods To improve the forecast accuracy and investigate the spread of SARS-CoV-2, we constructed four mathematical models to numerically estimate the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the efficacy of eradication strategies. Results Using the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) model, and including measures such as city closures and extended leave policies implemented by the Chinese government that effectively reduced the beta value, we estimated that the beta value and basic transmission number,R-0, of SARS-CoV-2 was 0.476/6.66 in Wuhan, 0.359/5.03 in Korea, and 0.400/5.60 in Italy. Considering medicine and vaccines, an advanced model demonstrated that the emergence of vaccines would greatly slow the spread of the virus. Our model predicted that 100,000 people would become infected assuming that the isolation rate alpha in Wuhan was 0.30. If quarantine measures were taken from March 10, 2020, and the quarantine rate of alpha was also 0.3, then the final number of infected people was predicted to be 11,426 in South Korea and 147,142 in Italy. Conclusions Our mathematical models indicate that SARS-CoV-2 eradication depends on systematic planning, effective hospital isolation, and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and some measures including city closures and leave policies should be implemented to ensure SARS-CoV-2 eradication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available