4.7 Article

Xanthine oxidase inhibitory peptides derived from tuna protein: virtual screening, inhibitory activity, and molecular mechanisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages 1349-1354

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10745

Keywords

xanthine oxidase; inhibition mechanism; peptides; molecular docking

Funding

  1. Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health [20181036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identified a novel tetrapeptide, EEAK, from tuna protein with high XO inhibitory activity, which binds to pivotal residues of XO's active sites through conventional hydrogen bond interactions and electrostatic interactions. This suggests that EEAK could serve as a potential candidate for treating gout and hyperuricemia.
BACKGROUND There has been growing interest in the use of xanthine oxidase (XO) as a therapeutic agent to prevent gout and hyperuricemia. In the present study, XO inhibitory peptides were identified from tuna protein by virtual screening, and molecular docking was used to elicit the interaction mechanism between XO and peptides. RESULTS A novel tetrapeptide, EEAK, exhibited high XO inhibitory activity with an IC(50)of 173.00 +/- 0.06 mu M. Molecular docking analysis revealed that EEAK bound with the pivotal residues of XO's active sites (i.e., Glu802, Arg880, Glu1261) through two conventional hydrogen bond interactions, two attractive charge interactions, and one salt bridge. EEAK could also bind with the residues Phe649, Leu648, Lys771, Ser876, Phe914, and Thr1010 of XO. CONCLUSION This study suggested that conventional hydrogen bond interactions and electrostatic interactions play an important role in XO inhibition. The novel XO inhibitory peptide EEAK from tuna protein could be used as potential candidate for controlling gout and hyperuricemia. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available