4.0 Article

Testing independence and goodness-of-fit jointly for functional linear models

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 380-402

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s42952-020-00083-4

Keywords

Functional linear model; Generalized distance covariance; Goodness-of-fit; Independence test; Strong negative type space

Funding

  1. NSFC [11771032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A conventional regression model for functional data requires the relationship between the predictor function and the response variable to be expressed. Two assumptions regarding independence between predictor function and error, as well as a functional linear model for the relationship, are usually added to the model. A test procedure based on generalized distance covariance is developed to check these assumptions simultaneously, showing consistent performance against alternatives.
A conventional regression model for functional data involves expressing a response variable in terms of the predictor function. Two assumptions, that (i) the predictor function and the error are independent and (ii) the relationship between the response variable and the predictor function takes functional linear model, are usually added to the model. Checking the validation of these two assumptions is fundamental to statistic inference and practical applications. We develop a test procedure to check these assumptions simultaneously based on generalized distance covariance. We establish the asymptotic theory for the proposed test under null and alternative hypotheses, and provide a bootstrap procedure to obtain the critical value of the test. The proposed test is consistent against all alternatives provided that the semimetrics related to the generalized distance are strong negative, and can be readily generalized to other functional regression models. We explore the finite sample performance of the proposed test by using both simulations and real data examples. The results illustrate that the proposed method has favorable performance compared with the competing method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available