4.7 Article

Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of functionally graded ceramics

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 2049-2057

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.029

Keywords

Ceramics; Additive manufacturing; Extrusion; Functionally graded materials; Dynamic mixing

Funding

  1. Honeywell Federal Manufacturing Technologies
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-NA0002839]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on enabling CODE for fabricating functionally graded ceramics by controlling the flowrate of different ceramic pastes and utilizing a dynamic mixer to achieve material gradients. Evaluation of sintered samples' dimensions and Vickers hardness measurements indicate the potential of CODE in manufacturing functionally graded components.
The Ceramic On-Demand Extrusion (CODE) process has been recently proposed for additive manufacturing of dense, strong ceramic components via extrusion with uniform layered drying. This study focuses on enabling CODE to fabricate functionally graded ceramics. A controlled volumetric flowrate for each ceramic paste was used to achieve a gradient between alumina and zirconia. A dynamic mixer was built to mix constituent ceramic pastes homogeneously. Functionally graded alumina/zirconia samples were printed, sintered, and tested to examine the capability of CODE in fabricating functionally graded components. The desired and actual material compositions were compared using energy dispersive spectroscopy. Dimensions of sintered samples were evaluated to study the deformation of functionally graded components during drying and sintering. Vickers hardness was also measured at different locations, corresponding to different material compositions. Finally, a case study was conducted to demonstrate the capability of the proposed method to build functionally graded ceramics with complex geometries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available