4.4 Article

Role-play of real patients improves the clinical performance of medical students

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 183-190

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000431

Keywords

Education; medical

Funding

  1. Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [2018-07-014B]
  2. Szu-Zuan Research Foundation of Internal Medicine [109005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the impact of medical students portraying real patients in interactive clinical reasoning training on their clinical performance. The results showed that students who participated in role-play had significantly increased mini-CEX scores, particularly in interviewing skills, counselling, and overall clinical competence. In contrast, students who did not participate in role-play had lower scores and did not show improvement after training. Role-playing real patients can enhance medical students' counselling skills and clinical competences.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether the role-play (RP) of real patients by medical students as part of interactive clinical reasoning training can improve medical students' clinical performance. Methods: A total of 26 medical students volunteered to portray real patients within this program and were treated as the RP group while the other 72 students as the non-RP group. In the interactive morning meeting, the medical students practiced how to approach the RP student as if they were encountering a real patient. All students were evaluated by mini-clinical evaluation exercises (mini-CEX) before and after this training program. Results: We found that all students had an increased total mini-CEX score after 4-week training, especially for interviewing skills. Notably, after training, the RP students had significantly elevated total mini-CEX scores (51.23 +/- 1.06 vs 53.12 +/- 1.11, p = 0.028), and for counselling (7.15 +/- 0.14 vs 7.54 +/- 0.18, p = 0.015) and overall clinical competence (7.27 +/- 0.15 vs 7.65 +/- 0.16, p = 0.030). In contrast, the non-RP students had lower scores compared with the RP group, as revealed by both the pre- and post-training tests. Moreover, their mini-CEX scores were not improved after training. Conclusion: Medical students who were motivated to RP real patients had better performance scores than those who did not. In addition, RP can enhance their counselling skills and clinical competences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available