4.2 Article

Practitioner Engagement in Activities of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN): 7-Year Results

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 687-697

Publisher

AMER BOARD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190339

Keywords

Continuing Education; General Practitioners; National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Practice-Based Research; Publishing; Retrospective Studies

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U19-DE-22516, U19-DE-28717]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To 1) quantify practitioner activities of the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (Network) for which Continuing Education (CE) credits were received (study training, videos, webinars, meetings, and symposia); 2) quantify practitioner coauthoring Network publications and presentations; and 3) test whether practitioner characteristics were associated with participation in these activities. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 4361 practitioners who enrolled in the Network between April 12, 2012 and October 12, 2018. Results: Overall, 59% (n = 2586) of practitioners earned CE credit from the Network; among these, 68% (n = 1757) from a video, 38% (n = 993) attended an annual Network meeting, 31% (n = 798) due to training for a Network clinical study, 9% (n = 226) attended a national symposium, and 7% (n = 170) participated in a Network webinar. Members of 2 large group practices earned on average more CEs than practitioners from other practice settings. Four percent (n = 159) of practitioners coauthored a Network presentation or publication. Practitioners who received their dental degree before 2000, were general practitioners, or were members of 2 large group practices, were more likely to have coauthored a publication or presentation. Conclusion: This Network used a broad range of activities to engage community practitioners. These activities were successful in sustaining a high level of practitioner engagement in clinical research and its relevance to everyday clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available