4.1 Article

Geomorphological hazards susceptibility in high-density urban areas: A case study of Mexico City

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUTH AMERICAN EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102667

Keywords

Geomorphological mapping; Urban geomorphology; Natural hazards; Developing countries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing countries face more impacts due to natural hazards because of rapid urbanization, natural resources overexploitation, and lack of territorial management. Mexico City is one of the most populated metropolitan areas of the world and in addition, due to its geophysical dynamics and increasing vulnerability, is frequently impacted by natural disasters. Every year, various natural hazards affect Iztapalapa district, the most densely populated political-administrative unit in Mexico, and represent a high risk for approximately two million inhabitants. We used various geomorphic analyses to develop a feasible methodology to reduce the disaster risk in Iztapalapa district. In order to understand the general geomorphic dynamic of Iztapalapa district, we defined three geomorphological regions: the lacustrine plain, the volcanic piedmont, and the mountain area. Afterwards, we developed a geomorphological mapping based on LiDAR and aerial photographs to obtain thirty landforms divided into endogenic and exogenic landforms, both erosional and depositional, at 1:20,000 scale. Based on these maps, we described four geomorphological hazard zonation for floods, subsidence, soil fractures, and rockfalls in Iztapalapa district. The higher occurrence of subsidence, soil fractures and floods are in the palustrine plains, while rockfalls are associated with volcanic slopes. This study provides important input for local and regional stakeholders on territorial and risk management. Moreover, this practical methodology can be applied in other countries to facilitate disaster risk assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available