Journal
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4048548
Keywords
concentrating solar power; solid particles; thermal energy storage; fluidized bed; heat exchanger; supercritical CO2 power cycle; energy; heat transfer; renewable; solar tower; thermal power
Categories
Funding
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
- DOE SuNLaMP program
- Sandia National Laboratories (SNL)
- DOE Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) DAYS program
- Solar Energy Technology Office (SETO) Generation 3 CSP
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Research has shown that utilizing high-temperature and high-efficiency supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle technology, combined with inexpensive and stable high-temperature heat transfer fluids and storage media, has the potential to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of concentrating solar power generation.
Concentrating solar power (CSP) development has focused on increasing the energy conversion efficiency and lowering the capital cost. To improve performance, CSP research is moving to high-temperature and high-efficiency designs. One technology approach is to use inexpensive, high-temperature heat transfer fluids and storage, integrated with a high-efficiency power cycle such as the supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO(2)) Brayton power cycle. The sCO(2) Brayton power cycle has strong potential to achieve performance targets of 50% thermal-to-electric efficiency and dry cooling at an ambient temperature of up to 40 degrees C and to reduce the cost of power generation. Solid particles have been proposed as a possible high-temperature heat transfer or storage medium that is inexpensive and stable at high temperatures above 1000 degrees C. The particle/sCO(2) heat exchanger (HX) provides a connection between the particles and sCO(2) fluid in emerging sCO(2) power cycles. This article presents heat transfer modeling to analyze the particle/sCO(2) HX design and assess design tradeoffs including the HX cost. The heat transfer process was modeled based on a particle/sCO(2) counterflow configuration, and empirical heat transfer correlations for the fluidized bed and sCO(2) were used to calculate heat transfer area and estimate the HX cost. A computational fluid dynamics simulation was applied to characterize particle distribution and fluidization. This article shows a path to achieve the cost and performance objectives for a particle/sCO(2) HX design by using fluidized-bed technology.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available