4.6 Article

Perceived barriers to implementation of injury prevention programs among collegiate women's soccer coaches

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 352-356

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.09.016

Keywords

Athletic injuries; Knee injuries; Anterior cruciate ligament; Exercise therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [T32 HD007490]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study identifies cost as the primary barrier to implementation of knee injury prevention programs (IPPs), with most non-users indicating that implementation should be the responsibility of non-coaching staff members. A team-based approach involving athletes, coaches, and non-coaching staff members may support long-term implementation of IPPs.
Objectives: Knee injury prevention programs (IPPs) reduce knee and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury rates in female athletes, however, implementation of IPPs is low. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to implementation of IPPs among collegiate women's soccer coaches. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: A custom survey based on the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework and existing literature was sent to 151 out of 153 women's National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) soccer coaches in the NCAA's Eastern Region. Results: Ten respondents reported that they did not use an IPP (Non-users), and nineteen respondents reported that they did use an IPP (Users). Cost was the most highly ranked barrier (median rank: 2) to implementing an IPP among Non-users. For the statement, Who should be responsible for completing an IPP, Users said Coaches (47%) and Other (21%), while Non-users said Strength and conditioning (50%) and Athletic trainers (30%). Respondents who marked Other, elaborated that it was the responsibility of coaches, athletes, and additional staff members. Conclusions: Cost was the primary barrier to implementation of an IPP. Since the majority of Non-users indicated that implementation of an IPP was the responsibility of a non-coaching staff member, cost may be a surrogate for the expense of hiring an additional staff member rather than the cost of performing the IPP itself. Additionally, using a team-based approach that encompasses athletes, coaches, and noncoaching staff members may support long-term implementation of IPPs. (C) 2020 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available