4.5 Review

Clinical performance of single implant-supported ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 369-376

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.011

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the clinical performance of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns in terms of prosthesis failure, complication rate, and patient satisfaction. The study found no statistically significant differences between ceramic and MC crowns in terms of these outcomes. Therefore, the choice of single implant crown material may depend on the preference of the dentist and patient.
Statement of problem. Evidence relating to the choice of materials for single implant-supported crowns is sparse. Purpose. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess articles that compared the clinical performance of ceramic and metal-ceramic (MC) implant-supported single crowns with regard to prosthesis failure, complication rate, and patient satisfaction. Material and methods. A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) was performed. The last search was conducted in December 2019. Randomized clinical trials comparing ceramic and MC implant-supported single crowns with at least a 12-month follow-up were included, all of which were published in English. The pooled effects were presented as both a risk difference (RD) and mean difference according to the type of data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Seven randomized clinical trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data did not show any statistically significant differences concerning prosthesis failure (RD: 0.000, 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.06), marginal bone loss (mean difference [MD]: -0.02, 95% CI: -0.75 to 0.35), mechanical complications (RD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.07), biological complications (RD: 0.02, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.11), or patient satisfaction (MD: 4.86, 95% CI: -2.86 to 12.58). Conclusions. Ceramic and MC crowns had similar outcomes with regard to prosthesis failure, mechanical and biological complication rates, and patient satisfaction. As a result, the selection of single implant crown material depends on the preference of the dentist and patient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available