4.8 Article

Non-invasive investigation of predominant processes in the impedance spectra of high energy lithium-ion batteries with nickel-cobalt-aluminum cathodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 472, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228189

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Nickel-cobalt-aluminum; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Project Offenes Batterie-Alterungs-Tool zur Lebensdauerprognose von Batteriepacks unter Beruecksichtigueng von Unsicherheiten und Streuung von Zellqualitaet [FKZ 0325905]
  2. project Gruene Elektrochemische Energiespeicher [FKZ 313-W044B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis and prediction of the state of health (SOH) of batteries in the electromobility sector is of supreme importance. In this regard, non-invasive techniques present unique opportunities. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) allows detailed investigations of predominant processes at both electrodes. However, a proper understanding of the impedance spectra is crucial, especially for the assignment of the major phenomena to their corresponding electrodes. In this work, impedance spectra of a high energy lithium-ion battery (Panasonic NCR18650B: NCA vs. graphite) are investigated. Half-cells and commercial cells are measured by means of EIS and analyzed using the distribution of relaxation times (DRT) and an equivalent circuit model (ECM). Additionally, differential voltage analyses (DVA) are performed, activation energies are calculated and resistances at two different SOH are compared to each other. It is concluded that at low SOC, the NCA's charge transfer is the predominant process. At high SOC, the NCA's and/or the graphite's charge transfer are the predominant processes. EIS-analysis and DVA at different SOH with the aim of investigating the aging processes of both electrodes separately proved that the electrodes show severe degradations at an SOH of about C/C-0 = 70%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available