4.3 Article

Elasticity of tangled magnetic fields

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLASMA PHYSICS
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022377820001191

Keywords

plasma waves; astrophysical plasmas; plasma dynamics

Funding

  1. STFC studentship
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/R034737/1]
  3. STFC [ST/S000488/1]
  4. Hintze Family Charitable Foundation
  5. EPSRC [EP/R034737/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fundamental difference between incompressible ideal magnetohydrodynamics and the dynamics of a non-conducting fluid is that magnetic fields exert a tension force that opposes their bending; magnetic fields behave like elastic strings threading the fluid. It is natural, therefore, to expect that a magnetic field tangled at small length scales should resist a large-scale shear in an elastic way, much as a ball of tangled elastic strings responds elastically to an impulse. Furthermore, a tangled field should support the propagation of 'magnetoelastic waves', the isotropic analogue of Alfven waves on a straight magnetic field. Here, we study magnetoelasticity in the idealised context of an equilibrium tangled field configuration. In contrast to previous treatments, we explicitly account for intermittency of the Maxwell stress, and show that this intermittency necessarily decreases the frequency of magnetoelastic waves in a stable field configuration. We develop a mean-field formalism to describe magnetoelastic behaviour, retaining leading-order corrections due to the coupling of large- and small-scale motions, and solve the initial-value problem for viscous fluids subjected to a large-scale shear, showing that the development of small-scale motions results in anomalous viscous damping of large-scale waves. Finally, we test these analytic predictions using numerical simulations of standing waves on tangled, linear force-free magnetic-field equilibria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available