4.5 Article

Electrical and thermal transport properties of natural and synthetic FeAsxS2-x (x ≤ 0.01)

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109809

Keywords

Natural mineral; Pyrite; Electrical transport; Thermoelectricity

Funding

  1. SAB (Sachsische Aufbaubank) project [100323510]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of natural pyrite crystals from the Erzgebirge region in Germany revealed that arsenic doping leads to smaller semiconductor energy gaps and a switch in conduction type mechanism from n-type to p-type. The electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient measurements of synthetic FeAsxS2-x solid solutions supported these findings. Additionally, the study showed that impurities of insulating metal oxides in sintered FeS2 + MO2 composites have less influence on the electrical transport properties of pyrite.
The combined powder X-ray diffraction, microstructural, local and bulk chemical analyses of natural pyrite single crystals from Reiche Zeche, Johangeorgenstadt and Pretzchendorf (Erzgebirge, Saxony, Germany) showed compositions FeAs0.002(1)S1.998(9), FeAs0.004(1)S1.996(9) and FeAs0.005(1)S1.995(9), respectively. The arsenic doping leads to smaller semiconducting energy gaps (E-g similar to 0.1-0.2 eV) in comparison with binary FeS2 (E-g = 0.96 eV), as well as switching of conduction type mechanism from n-to the p-type. These findings are supported by the measurements of the electrical resistivity and Seebeck coefficient of the synthetic FeAsxS2-x series (maximal As-content x = 0.01 at 773 K). The investigations of sintered FeS2 + MO2 (M = Si, Ti, Zr) composites indicate that some insulating metal oxides as impurities influence less the electrical transport properties of pyrite. All performed studies unambiguously confirmed that p-type conductivity for T > 300 K is a hallmark of the ternary Asdoped FeAsxS2-x (x = 0.002) pyrites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available