4.8 Article

The Ground State Electronic Energy of Benzene

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages 8922-8929

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02621

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Independent Research Fund Denmark
  3. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-01ER15228]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21033001, 21973054]
  6. U.S. National Science Foundation [1665333, CHE-1800584, ACI-1445606]
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP18H03900]
  8. Sloan research fellowship
  9. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-18-1-0095]
  10. Molecular Sciences Software Institute - U.S. National Science Foundation [ACI-1547580]
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  12. Division Of Chemistry [1665333] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the findings of a blind challenge devoted to determining the frozen-core, full configuration interaction (FCI) ground-state energy of the benzene molecule in a standard correlation-consistent basis set of double-zeta quality. As a broad international endeavor, our suite of wave function-based correlation methods collectively represents a diverse view of the high-accuracy repertoire offered by modern electronic structure theory. In our assessment, the evaluated high-level methods are all found to qualitatively agree on a final correlation energy, with most methods yielding an estimate of the FCI value around -863 mE(H). However, we find the root-mean-square deviation of the energies from the studied methods to be considerable (1.3 mE(H)), which in light of the acclaimed performance of each of the methods for smaller molecular systems clearly displays the challenges faced in extending reliable, near-exact correlation methods to larger systems. While the discrepancies exposed by our study thus emphasize the fact that the current state-of-the-art approaches leave room for improvement, we still expect the present assessment to provide a valuable community resource for benchmark and calibration purposes going forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available