4.1 Article

Development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for ocular disposition of monoclonal antibodies in rabbits

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 597-612

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10928-020-09713-0

Keywords

Eye; Ocular pharmacokinetics; Antibody; Rabbit; Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model

Funding

  1. NIH [GM114179, AI138195, R01CA246785]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of protein therapeutics for ocular disorders, particularly age-related macular degeneration (AMD), is a highly competitive and expanding therapeutic area. However, the application of a predictive and translatable ocular PK model to better understand ocular disposition of protein therapeutics, such as a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, is missing from the literature. Here, we present an expansion of an antibody platform PBPK model towards rabbit and incorporate a novel anatomical and physiologically relevant ocular component. Parameters describing all tissues, flows, and binding events were obtained from existing literature and fixed a priori. First, translation of the platform PBPK model to rabbit was confirmed by evaluating the model's ability to predict plasma PK of a systemically administered exogenous antibody. Then, the PBPK model with the new ocular component was validated by estimation of serum and ocular (i.e. aqueous humor, retina, and vitreous humor) PK of two intravitreally administered monoclonal antibodies. We show that the proposed PBPK model is capable of accurately (i.e. within twofold) predicting ocular exposure of antibody-based drugs. The proposed PBPK model can be used for preclinical-to-clinical translation of antibodies developed for ocular disorders, and assessment of ocular toxicity for systemically administered antibody-based therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available