4.2 Article

Effect of piroxicam administration on outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 296-301

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.14521

Keywords

embryo transfer; in vitro fertilization; nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; piroxicam; pregnancy

Funding

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the administration of piroxicam before frozen-thawed ET had no significant effect on the clinical or biochemical pregnancy rate among women undergoing IVF. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are recommended.
Aim This study aimed to evaluate the effect of piroxicam adjuvant therapy on the clinical and biochemical pregnancy rate in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Methods In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 178 patients eligible for IVF-ET received either single dose of piroxicam 1-2 h before frozen-thawed ET or a placebo at the same time. Study participants were then followed and compared regarding the primary outcome of the study, which was biochemical (positive beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin test) and clinical pregnancy (detected fetal heart beat in ultrasound) rate. Results The results of this study indicated that there is no significant association between the piroxicam administration before frozen-thawed ET and the clinical or biochemical pregnancy rate (P = 0.208 andP= 0.699, respectively). Conclusion The findings of the current study suggest that piroxicam administration before ET has no beneficial effects on pregnancy rate among women undergoing IVF and frozen-thawed ET. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available