Development, diagnostic performance, and interobserver agreement of a 18F-flurpiridaz PET automated perfusion quantitation system

Background Computerized methodologies standardize the myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) interpretation process. Methods To develop an automated relative perfusion quantitation approach for(18)F-flurpiridaz, PET MPI studies from all phase III trial participants of(18)F-flurpiridaz were divided into 3 groups. Count distributions were obtained in N = 40 normal patients undergoing pharmacological or exercise stress. Then, N = 90 additional studies were selected in a derivation group. Following receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, various standard deviations below the mean normal were used as cutoffs for significant CAD, and interobserver variability determined. Finally, diagnostic performance was compared between blinded visual readers and blinded derivations of automated relative quantitation in the remaining N = 548 validation patients. Results Both approaches yielded comparable accuracies for the detection of global CAD, reaching 71% and 72% by visual reads, and 72% and 68% by automated relative quantitation, when using CAD >= 70% or >= 50% stenosis for significance, respectively. Similar results were observed when analyzing individual coronary territories. In both pharmacological and exercise stress, automated relative quantitation demonstrated significantly more interobserver agreement than visual reads. Conclusions Our automated method of(18)F-flurpiridaz relative perfusion analysis provides a quantitative, objective, and highly reproducible assessment of PET MPI in normal and CAD subjects undergoing either pharmacological or exercise stress.

Automated summary

This study developed an automated relative perfusion quantitation approach for PET MPI. The results showed that both automated relative quantitation and visual reads yielded comparable accuracies for the detection of global CAD, with the former demonstrating better interobserver agreement.