4.5 Article

Mechanisms underlying the enhancement of γ-aminobutyric acid responses in the external globus pallidus of R6/2 Huntington's disease model mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages 2349-2356

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24710

Keywords

electrophysiology; external globus pallidus; GABA transporters; Huntington's disease; RRID; AB_2107445; RRID; AB_2858195; RRID; SCR_003070; RRID; SCR_011323; Western blots

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F32NS093813, NS096994, NS41574]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Huntington's disease (HD), the output of striatal indirect pathway medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs) is altered in its target region, the external globus pallidus (GPe). In a previous study we demonstrated that selective optogenetic stimulation of indirect pathway MSNs induced prolonged decay time of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) responses in GPe neurons. Here we identified the mechanism underlying this alteration. Electrophysiological recordings in slices from symptomatic R6/2 and wildtype (WT) mice were used to evaluate, primarily, the effects of GABA transporter (GAT) antagonists on responses evoked by optogenetic activation of indirect pathway MSNs. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Western blots (WBs) were used to examine GAT-3 expression in HD and WT mice. A GAT-3 blocker (SNAP5114) increased decay time of GABA responses in WT and HD GPe neurons, but the effect was significantly greater in WT neurons. In contrast, a GAT-1 antagonist (NO-711) or a GABA(B)receptor antagonist (CGP 54626) produced small increases in decay time but no differential effects between genotypes. IHC and WBs showed reduction of GAT-3 expression in the GPe of HD mice. Thus, reduced expression or dysfunction of GAT-3 could underlie alterations of GPe responses to GABA inputs from striatum and could be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available